Barthe Y., Mays, C., 1998, High profile and deep strategy : communication and information practices in France’s underground laboratory siting process. A RISKPERCOM national case study on communication and radioactive waste management (Note SEGR 98/18), Paris, IPSN.
Cebrián A., Prades A., Solá R., 1998, The communication strategy of a Spanish institution about radioactive waste. A RISKPERCOM national cased study, Madrid, Ciemat.
Corbett E.-P.-J., Connors R.-J., 1998, Classical rhetoric for the modern student, New York, Oxford University Press.
Drottz-Sjöberg B.-M., 1998, Stämningar i Malå efter folkomröstningen 1997 (Projekt Rapport PR D-98-03), Stockholm, SKB.
Drottz-Sjöberg B.-M., Persson L., 1993, « Public reaction to radiation : Fear, anxiety or phobia ? » Health Physics, 64, pp. 223-231.
Drottz-Sjöberg B.-M., Rumyantseva G. M., Martyushov A. N., Arkhangelskaya H. V., Nyagu A., Ageeva L. A., 1994, Public reactions to the Chernobyl accident. Report from a data collection in 1993 in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. Social and Psychological Factors, The Joint Study Project 2 of the European Communit, Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics.
Fischhoff B., 1995, « Risk perception and communication unplugged : Twenty years of process », Risk Analysis, 15, pp. 137-145.
Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S., 1982, « Lay foibles and expert fables in judgments about risk », American Statistician, 36, pp. 240-255.
Fisher A., Sjöberg L., 1990, « Radon risks : People’s perceptions and reactions », pp. 398-411, in : Majumdar S.-K., Schmalz R.-F., Miller E.-W. Eds., Environmental radon : Occurrence, control and health hazards, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Academy of Science.
Flynn J., Chalmers, Easterling J., Kasperson D., Kunreuther R., Mertz H., Mushkatel C.-K., Pijawka A., Slovic K.-D., Dotto P., 1995, One hundred centuries of solitude. Redirecting America’s high-level nuclear waste policy, Boulder, CO Westview Press.
Goffman E., 1990, Stigma : notes on the management of spoiled identity, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.
Jasanoff S., 1998, « The political science of risk perception », Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59, pp. 91-99.
Kapferer J.-N., 1989, « A mass poisoning rumor in Europe », Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, pp. 467-481.
Kasperson R.-E., 1992, « The social amplification of risk : progress in developing an integrative framework », pp. 153-178, in : S. Krimsky, D. Golding, eds., Social theories of risk, Westport, Praeger.
Kasperson R.-E., Renn, O., Slovic P., Brown H. S., Emel J., Goble R., Kasperson J.-X., Ratick S., 1988, « The social amplification of risk », Risk Analysis, 8, pp. 177-187.
Loewenstein G. F., Weber E.-U., Hsee C.-K., Welch N., 2001, « Risk as feelings », Psychological Bulletin, 127, pp. 267-286.
Lundgren R., McMakin A., 1998, Risk communication. A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks, Columbus, OH, Battelle.
Mays C., Egouy R., 1998, Mission communication Press office and related activities at France’s institute for nuclear safety and protection (IPSN). A RISKPERCOM cross national case study on institutional communication (Note SEGR 98/19), Paris, IPSN.
Menard M., Prades A., Solá R., 1998, Analysis of the institutional communication strategy of the nuclear safety council in Spain. A RISKPERCOM common case study, Madrid, Ciemat.
National Research Council, 1989, Improving risk communication, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
Noresson J.-Å., 1985, Kynnet som försätter berg, Munkedal, Bokskogen.
Peters R. G., Covello V. T., McCallum D. B., 1997, « The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication : An empirical study », Risk Analysis, 17, pp. 43-54.
Petterson J. S., 1988, « Perception vs reality of radiological impact : The Goiania model », Nuclear News, 31, pp. 84-90.
Renn O., 1992, « Risk communication : Towards a rational discourse with the public », Journal of Hazardous Materials, 29, pp. 465-519.
Renn O., Burns W., Kasperson R. E., Kasperson J. X., Slovic P., 1992, « The social amplification of risk : Theoretical foundations and empirical application », Journal of Social Issues, 48, pp. 137-160.
Rowe G., Wright G., 2001, « Differences in expert and lay judgments of risk : myth or reality ? », Risk Analysis, 21, pp. 341-356.
Shrader-Frechette K. S., 1993, Burying uncertainty : Risk and the case against geological disposal of nuclear waste, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
Sjöberg L., 1980, « The risks of risk analysis », Acta Psychologica, 45, pp. 301-321.
Sjöberg L., 1989, Radon risks : Attitudes, perceptions and actions (EPA-230-04-89-049), U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Analysis.
Sjöberg L., 1991, Risk perception by experts and the public (Rhizikon : Risk Research Report 4), Stockholm, Center for Risk Research.
Sjöberg L., 1998a, « Risk perception : experts and the public », European Psychologist, 3, pp. 1-13.
Sjöberg L., 1998b, « Worry and risk perception », Risk Analysis, 18, pp. 85-93.
Sjöberg L., 1999, « Perceived competence and motivation in industry and government as factors in risk perception », pp. 89-99, in : G. Cvetkovich, R. E. Löfstedt, eds., Social trust and the management of risk, London, Earthscan.
Sjöberg L., 2000, « Perceived risk and tampering with nature », Journal of Risk Research, 3, pp. 353-367.
Sjöberg L., 2001a, Attitudes and risk perceptions of stakeholders in a nuclear waste siting issue, unpublished manuscript.
Sjöberg L., 2001b, « Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust », Risk Analysis, 21(1), pp. 189-198.
Sjöberg L., 2001c, Riskuppfattning och inställningen till djupförvar för använt kärnbränsle i fyra kommuner, Stockholm, Svensk Kärnbränslehantering (SKB) AB.
Sjöberg L., (in press-a), « The allegedly simple structure of experts’ risk perception : An urban legend in risk research », Science, Technology and Human Values.
Sjöberg L., (in press-b), « Are received risk perception models alive and well ? », Risk Analysis.
Sjöberg L., (in press-c), « Distal factors in risk perception », Journal of Risk Research.
Sjöberg L., (in press-d) « New Age and risk perception », Risk Analysis.
Sjöberg L., (in press-e), « Rational risk perception : Utopia or dystopia ? », in : P. Wiedemann Ed., The future of risk, Munich, Bavarian Re.
Sjöberg L., Drottz-Sjöberg B.-M., 2001, « Fairness, risk and risk tolerance in the siting of a nuclear waste repository », Journal of Risk Research, 4 (1), pp. 75-102.
Sjöberg L., Fromm J., 2001, « Information technology risks as seen by the public », Risk Analysis, 21, pp. 427-442.
Sjöberg L., Montgomery H., 1999, « Double denial in attitude formation », Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, pp. 606-621.
Sjöberg L., Truedsson J., Frewer L., Prades A., 2000, « Through a glass darkly : Experts’ and the public’s mutual risk perception », pp. 1157-1162, in : M. P. Cottam, D. W. Harvey, R. P. Pape J. Tait, eds., Foresight and precaution. Volume 1, Rotterdam, A. A. Balkema.
Sjöberg L., Viklund M., Truedsson J., (in press), « Attitudes and opposition in siting a high level nuclear waste repository », in : H. Lesbirel, D. Shaw, eds., Title not yet provided, New York, Columbia University Press.
Slovic P., 1993, « Perceived risk, trust, and democracy », Risk Analysis, 13, pp. 675-682.
Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichtenstein S., 1979, « Rating the risks », Environment, 21 (3), pp. 14-20, 36-39.
Slovic P., Flynn J., Gregory, R., 1994, « Stigma happens : Social problems in the siting of nuclear waste facilities », Risk Analysis, 14, pp. 773-778.
Slovic P., Flynn J. H., Layman M., 1991, « Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste », Science, 254, pp. 1603-1607.
Slovic P., Layman M., Kraus N., Flynn J., Chalmers J., Gesell G., 1991, « Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impact of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada », Risk Analysis, 11, pp. 683-696.
Trettin L., Musham C., 2000, « Is trust a realistic goal of environmental risk communication ? », Environment and Behavior, 32, pp. 410-426.
Williams B. L., Brown S., Greenberg M., 1999, « Determinants of trust perceptions among residents surrounding the Savannah river nuclear weapons site », Environment and Behavior, 31, pp. 354-371.